Earlier this morning, I dialed the number listed on the Members First website for its presidential candidate Billy Smith. Within about five seconds, Billy was on the other end of the phone asking me what the people in my work area need from his slate once Members First takes office. He stressed, “Every hub, every work place, every member faces different issues. What I would like is for all of our brothers and sisters to begin the communication process as soon as possible so our transition will be smoother in January.” After sharing some concerns relevant to my work assignment, I told him, “…but what I really called about was to ask you to explain this flier for the other slate I picked up at DFW.”
“I know you’ve put together a website, and I’ll be happy to answer your questions, but what I don’t want is a bunch of mud-slinging. Let’s be clear: I want to keep things as friendly as possible so the members won’t have to wade through any more distraction than what they’re already dealing with. I’m running for office, not to disgrace anyone’s personal character, so if you’re looking for a negative reaction about any opposing slate’s flier, I can’t give you that.”
Very presidential. I was definitely impressed.
Last week, I entered a break room at DFW’s UPS just as one of Wesley Jenkins’ business agents was finishing placing campaign information, which supported the current president’s slate, on our tables — a labor violation considering the agent not only used his security pass to gain access into a restricted area that most opposing slate members are prohibited from entering, but also because he was there on official union business, which is paid for by all members. This business agent happens to be the very same individual who willingly showed a group of members another worker’s private grievance form in 2003, thus causing our entire local to pay for yet another very costly re-election process. I was upset to see he was yet again disobeying labor election laws and wanted to have a closer look at whatever this important document was that he was risking his reputation in order to distribute.
Sadly, as I partially expected, it was not campaign literature discussing any of the positive accomplishments our leaders have achieved. Instead, the fliers trashed presidential candidate Brother Smith in a barrage of lies and half-truths in a manner inconsistent with our Oaths of Obligation. Perhaps, it is because of allowing unprofessionalism like this that our president was voted off the Joint Council 80. It certainly didn’t seem brotherly to say the least.
Billy won’t comment on the above topic “out of respect for the other candidates,” but he did take a few moments to answer some of my other questions, which I mostly lifted from the opposing slate’s questionnaire.
Q: First of all, thanks for taking the time to speak with me. The other slate claims they are “running on [their] experience.” What do you think about that, and what’s your slate “running on”?
